Non consumption use

SUR - Legal Hub - Non consumption use - Picture © Brent Stirton

Summary

Suriname lacks tourism legislation and an associated licensing system. Therefore, the role of wildlife in relation to ecotourism is completely absent in the legislation, although Suriname's tourism largely covers nature tourism. The current legal framework only provides for the designation of two types of protected areas: nature reserves and special management areas (also known as Multiple Use Management Areas, or MUMAs), and therefore is not completely aligned with the IUCN categorization for protected areas. Due to the statutory limitations set on nature reserves, public activities are generally not allowed. Only one government entity, Foundation for Nature Conservation in Suriname (STINASU), has been granted the authorization to operate in nature reserves. The main objectives are the promotion of nature research, nature conservation, education, and ecotourism. As a non-profit organization, STINASU manages Brownsberg Nature Park and co-manages Galibi Nature Reserve, Central Suriname Nature Reserve, Matapica Seaturtle Beaches and Boven Coesewijne Reserve, and will soon co-manage Kaburi Creek Park. However, it is noteworthy to mention that STINASU has no legal mandate to enforce rules governing these areas. It is a foundation and has not been granted these powers by law. 

Suriname has four MUMAs, which are often compared to IUCN category VI “protected areas with sustainable use of natural resources”. Management plans for some of the MUMAs have been prepared, but as yet have no legal status. To date, no management plans have been approved. Once approved, they will contain details on how tourism (including ecotourism) activities should be carried out in these MUMAs.

WILDLIFE CONSERVATION (ECOTOURISM)

INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK RELEVANT TO WILDLIFE CONSERVATION (ECOTOURISM)